Garrett Hardin's "Tragedy of the Commons" was one of our readings for my ENRM 221 class.
The reading, about 5 pages long -- was difficult to read at first. But it becomes very interesting, once you get used to the language and style.
The philosophy basically says that if resources or utilities were treated as a "commons" which anyone and everyone can occupy, use, and exploit - we are all bound to a tragic end. Specially since , "man - as a rational being," will always strive to reach his maximum potential (admit it, we all want to be winners in our own right). We are created to aim for more and to achieve the best, but it is difficult to aim for more without taking something from another, because realistically - we all live in a finite world. And this is where the concept of "survival of the fittest" kicks in.
The solution to this tragedy, as I understood from Hardin's text, is to make the "commons", "uncommon." To illustrate the philosophy, he likened the commons to national parks. These treasures are opened to the public so that everyone can enjoy the beauty that they bring. However, if no control is practice as to who or how many people can come in and enjoy the parks, they will eventually lose their value and the very reason why we are protecting them. Hence, to make them "uncommon," rules and laws are implemented. Such measures to make these treasures (parks) uncommon are regulation of visitors through limited opening days , or the charging of fees to limit the number of visitors.
Makes sense? To some people, this means depriving citizens to their right to see the parks. But to some people, it is a reasonable control measure. I noticed that they have implemented this control measure to our very own Underwater River in Palawan. Tourists wishing to see this natural wonder must plan their visits well and book a few months in advance, plus, there are also boat fees and entrance fees to the park.
In some ways, making the commons uncommon seems like an injustice to the larger population. But do you agree that we need these checks and balances in order to maintain order? The concept of private property, ownership limitations, compulsary taxes, private healthcare : all these are surprisingly, contributions to world inequality! But as Hardin also pointed out, "Injustice is preferable to total ruin."
Another simple illustration of the tragedy -- the ratio of condominium units to parking slots is 1 : 1 . This is a problem for occupants with more than one vehicle, who then resorted to parking in the commons : free spaces around the compound that are not designated parking spaces. Our developers did not foresee this overpopulation happening, therefore they had no control over these people who take advantage of the commons. There were no multiple vehicles policies, no "No Parking" signs , nor sanctions or penalties for obstruction of the common areas. The result? Overcrowding, safety issues, fire hazards, road blocks, and irrational fights among vehicle owners who all claim rights to the commons.
What other tragedies can we think about , how about intellectual property ( digital music and books as commons), or lives of celebrities as commons? Our rivers and oceans as commons? Anyone affected by the territorial disputes in our oceans will understand that the absence of concrete claims in these "common" territories is the source of all these misunderstandings.
I especially liked Hardin's discussion of the Tragedy alongside the issue of population growth:
"The most important aspect of necessity that we must now recognize, is the necessity of abandoning the commons in breeding. No technical solution can rescue us from the misery of overpopulation. Freedom to breed will bring ruin to all.... the only way we can preserve and nurture each other and more precious freedoms is by relinquishing the freedom to breed, and that very soon. 'Freedom is the recognition of a necessity' - and it is the role of education to reveal to all the necessity of abandoning the freedom to breed. Only so, can we put an end to this aspect of the Tragedy of the Commons."
It was a very interesting read , one that really gets your mind working. You may download your own PDF copy of the "Tragedy of the Commons" by Garett Hardin HERE.
Illustration acknowledgement: http://annystudio.com/show/0012/
The reading, about 5 pages long -- was difficult to read at first. But it becomes very interesting, once you get used to the language and style.
The philosophy basically says that if resources or utilities were treated as a "commons" which anyone and everyone can occupy, use, and exploit - we are all bound to a tragic end. Specially since , "man - as a rational being," will always strive to reach his maximum potential (admit it, we all want to be winners in our own right). We are created to aim for more and to achieve the best, but it is difficult to aim for more without taking something from another, because realistically - we all live in a finite world. And this is where the concept of "survival of the fittest" kicks in.
"Each man is locked into a system that compels him to increase his herd without limit - in a world that is limited. Ruin is the destination toward which all men rush , each pursuing his own best interest in a society that believes in freedom of the commons."
The solution to this tragedy, as I understood from Hardin's text, is to make the "commons", "uncommon." To illustrate the philosophy, he likened the commons to national parks. These treasures are opened to the public so that everyone can enjoy the beauty that they bring. However, if no control is practice as to who or how many people can come in and enjoy the parks, they will eventually lose their value and the very reason why we are protecting them. Hence, to make them "uncommon," rules and laws are implemented. Such measures to make these treasures (parks) uncommon are regulation of visitors through limited opening days , or the charging of fees to limit the number of visitors.
Makes sense? To some people, this means depriving citizens to their right to see the parks. But to some people, it is a reasonable control measure. I noticed that they have implemented this control measure to our very own Underwater River in Palawan. Tourists wishing to see this natural wonder must plan their visits well and book a few months in advance, plus, there are also boat fees and entrance fees to the park.
In some ways, making the commons uncommon seems like an injustice to the larger population. But do you agree that we need these checks and balances in order to maintain order? The concept of private property, ownership limitations, compulsary taxes, private healthcare : all these are surprisingly, contributions to world inequality! But as Hardin also pointed out, "Injustice is preferable to total ruin."
Another simple illustration of the tragedy -- the ratio of condominium units to parking slots is 1 : 1 . This is a problem for occupants with more than one vehicle, who then resorted to parking in the commons : free spaces around the compound that are not designated parking spaces. Our developers did not foresee this overpopulation happening, therefore they had no control over these people who take advantage of the commons. There were no multiple vehicles policies, no "No Parking" signs , nor sanctions or penalties for obstruction of the common areas. The result? Overcrowding, safety issues, fire hazards, road blocks, and irrational fights among vehicle owners who all claim rights to the commons.
What other tragedies can we think about , how about intellectual property ( digital music and books as commons), or lives of celebrities as commons? Our rivers and oceans as commons? Anyone affected by the territorial disputes in our oceans will understand that the absence of concrete claims in these "common" territories is the source of all these misunderstandings.
![]() | |
Equal opportunities vs survival of the fittest. |
"The most important aspect of necessity that we must now recognize, is the necessity of abandoning the commons in breeding. No technical solution can rescue us from the misery of overpopulation. Freedom to breed will bring ruin to all.... the only way we can preserve and nurture each other and more precious freedoms is by relinquishing the freedom to breed, and that very soon. 'Freedom is the recognition of a necessity' - and it is the role of education to reveal to all the necessity of abandoning the freedom to breed. Only so, can we put an end to this aspect of the Tragedy of the Commons."
It was a very interesting read , one that really gets your mind working. You may download your own PDF copy of the "Tragedy of the Commons" by Garett Hardin HERE.
Illustration acknowledgement: http://annystudio.com/show/0012/